Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Gravity'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • solidThinking Inspire
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
    • FAQs
  • solidThinking Evolve
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Click2Cast
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Click2Extrude
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
    • FAQs
  • solidThinking Click2Form
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Compose
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Activate
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Embed
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • Website
    • Comments and Suggestions
    • The Design Lounge

Categories

  • Images/Renderings
  • Models
  • Materials/Shaders
  • Videos
    • Animation

Found 1 result

  1. I’ve only been using Inspired for a few hours so please correct me if I’ve missed something. I’ve noticed that when gravity is included, there are several redundant members left in the final model. I assume the analysis has left them in as they are required support there own weight. To avoid this anomaly would it be possible to include a feature whose iterations had two stages for when gravity is included? For example: Iteration ‘1a’ wouldn’t include gravity and would only be used to remove elements whose strain is close to zero, while Iteration ‘1b’ would run normally including gravity. (I’ve attached a pdf showing my observations) I realise this would increase the analysis run time, but assuming what I’ve said is correct, I think it would be worth the wait. Inspired_Gravity.pdf