Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'continuity'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • solidThinking Inspire
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
    • FAQs
  • solidThinking Evolve
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Click2Cast
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Click2Extrude
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
    • FAQs
  • solidThinking Click2Form
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Compose
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Activate
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • solidThinking Embed
    • News & Announcements
    • General Discussion
    • Feature Requests
  • Website
    • Comments and Suggestions
    • The Design Lounge

Categories

  • Images/Renderings
  • Models
  • Materials/Shaders
  • Videos
    • Animation

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. Steve Barnhart

    Surface Continuity - A Comparison

    Can anyone explain to me why these two loft methods result in different surface geometry? 1. Loft curve 1 to curve 2 (with rails), Loft edge to curve 3 (same rails), adjust continuity to g2. 2. Loft curve 1 through curve 2 to curve 3 (with rails) Resulting geometry is similar, but not quite. It looks like the second method allows the isoparms to be evenly spaced across the entire surface, and therefore smoother overall. Also notice the strange artifact on the left-hand side of method one.